When people like this speak unguardedly, showing their true beliefs, I suddenly understand why the federal government's response to the disaster in New Orleans was so insanely incompetent: it appears that such unexamined racist beliefs exist under the surface with many people, to the point that humanitarian aid to African Americans in Louisiana was deliberately withheld because of a widespread belief that "crime gangs" were in control, in spite of evidence on every channel's news program that no one was in control and people were suffering.
So in that respect, I suppose former Secretary of Education William Bennett did us a favor with his "gamble" to voice the stereotypical views so many subscribe to. It shows what many in certain parts of the political spectrum still believe, and also shows under what circumstances the use of "abortion" enters their minds: as a law enforcement tool? "Morally reprehensible" or not, we do understand the kind of hypothetical arrangements Bennett thinks about, AND what basic beliefs he holds about African Americans and crime, even if he rejects that particular abortion hypothetical.
[I should add that I find nothing wrong with entertaining ANY hypothetical or "devil's advocate"
argument as an important element of critical thinking and logical exploration. Any student I've had from the past 15+ years would tell you that "no sacred cows" is the hallmark of how I like to structure classroom debate space. I won't criticize Bennett for looking at a patently absurd idea. I'm more afraid of what happens in a free society when topics "go underground" or are off-limits. I will, however, criticize the conclusions he drew from entertaining that particular hypothetical. In an earler draft of this post, I may not have made that point as clear as I'd have liked.]
Personally, I find a person who considers African Americans intrinsically linked to the crime rate "morally reprehensible," as Bennett went on to discuss them on a radio program to make some kind of larger point. That's why his explanation that he's being "mischaracterized" begs the question to the point of ridiculousness.
Perhaps the former Education Secretary could use a class in logic, as well as basic ethics, both usually taught in first or second year Philosophy courses.
We could even start a new education program for cabinet officers and political appointees past and present, call it "No Federal Official Left Behind."
Link: Washington Post & AP: Bennett: Black Abortions Would Lower Crime.
Bennett: Black Abortions Would Lower Crime
The Associated Press Friday, September 30, 2005; 10:59 AM
WASHINGTON -- The White House on Friday criticized former Education Secretary William Bennett for remarks linking the crime rate and the abortion of black babies.
"The president believes the comments were not appropriate," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said.
Former Education Secretary William Bennett ... was answering a caller's question when he took issue with the hypothesis put forth in a recent book that one reason crime is down is that abortion is up.
"But I do know that it's true that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could, if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down," said Bennett, author of "The Book of Virtues."
He went on to call that "an impossible, ridiculous and morally reprehensible thing to do, but your crime rate would go down. So these far-out, these far-reaching, extensive extrapolations are, I think, tricky."
[OK, he's against these extensive extrapolations. Way to take a stand, dude! But even tho he's against those things, he still had to admit his own "truth" about one particular extrapolation, that fewer African Americans would mean a lower crime rate, an unblinkingly racist stereotype that he CONTINUES to defend by not apologising.]
Responding later to criticism, Bennett said his comments had been mischaracterized and that his point was that the idea of supporting abortion to reduce crime was "morally reprehensible."
Bennett was education secretary under President Reagan and director of drug control policy when Bush's father was president.
Recent Comments