• Johnnycash89
  • Billclinton87
  • Billclintonh87
  • Hillarydaycare89
  • Swim_1
  • Rodeo
  • Cnnelectionnight2004
  • Myseatelection04
  • Electionnightnewsroom
  • Florence
  • Runners
  • Dontyson89
  • Plane_crash
  • Protest
  • Seinenetangle
  • Taj
  • Tajcorner
  • Snake
  • Indiakidstoschool98
  • Indiamarket


September 23, 2006

Designing for Blogs, Part 1: A Brief Manifesto

I'm an unabashed fan of working smarter, not harder.

In 1999, before I first happened on blog software or even the precursor called "EditThisPage," I was working with a few student programmers on a similar system in PHP, for classroom uses, collaborative projects, and portfolio-based active learning. What I really wanted to do was get away from the limitations of WebCT and Blackboard for more student-centered learning, instead of reproducing traditional classroom structures online. And I didn't want to have to keep teaching students HTML in classes that had other work to do.

When I saw that EditThisPage, Radio Userland and other applications were already doing what I was attempting to build from scratch in my dining room, I realized that the idea was so simple and such a logical next step, hundreds of people were probably doing exactly what I was doing, in different arenas, to make publishing accessible to more people. I saw that I could use blog tools for just about anything I could imagine with HTML and Flash, and save myself a whole lot of work.

And why did the blog idea catch fire as the killer app, when content management systems on the corporate side were plentiful? I strongly believe the answer is a timely combination of the rise of Google along with RSS.

Even though feed readers are having difficulty reaching non-tech users, feeds and tags are becoming an intrinsic structure in nearly everything we build. Quite simply, I won't build another freelance/contract web site that is not RSS/Atom-enabled. It's a no-brainer. Blogs are the display and feeds give the display legs. Technorati.com would not exist without feeds. And the massive social movement that is the blogosphere would not exist at all without RSS behind it.

So these days, rather than endlessly re-inventing the wheel, I'm primarily designing for CSS and the content-management shell blog software provides, a shell I can pour nearly anything into. Do I ever wish for the old blank-slate, starting fresh with a new audience/user interaction model every time?

Sometimes, but Web functionality is so crucial to interactive communities and a public commons that solo work in Flash feels empty to me, like an essential piece is missing. I think we'll end up one day defining "interactivity" as something that essentially must have more than one author, perhaps even many authors.

And lately, when I want to push on the limits of what interactivity can do, I find myself reaching for an even more robust system, pmachine's Expression Engine, where I can situate multiple blog modules in different contexts on the same page, and still retain my permalink archives and flexible CSS designs.

My only complaint so far is that I want some of the features I find in Scoop, features of audience-driven, "self-organizing" sites.

Not too long ago, someone asked me to predict where interactive media and the Internet would be five years from now. I refused to give an answer, because I don't get to decide. The beauty of a grassroots, bottom-up social movement like in the blogosphere is that the social structures provide an organic kind of direction and structure, and the social structure is the authority, not "industry leaders" or "futurists" or any other professional prognosticators striving for control or a first-mover advantage.

Interactivity is about giving up control.

What I strive to do as a designer and a participant in this grassroots social movement is to create tools that empower the most people with enough freedom to set their own directions. I'm not interested in herding cats. I am interested in watching and learning inductively from where cats go.

That's what Web 2.0 is about. That's why it rose from the ashes of the top-down corporate- and VC-driven creations that crashed and burned after all the money turned to vapor. What we valued most was what remained. Communities, interactions, strong ties, weak ties. Rich relationships over time. Rabid flame wars. Not endlessly pitching widgets while dropping names to bugger your Google/Technorati rank.

That's also why, in what some are calling a Web boomlet, I see business people desperately trying to appropriate blogs for various business models, proclaiming themselves authorities on their blog content niche as if they were following a stock professional copywriting formula, many diluting content in search engine-optimized blog sites that literally suck all the life out of the real reasons for blogging, the real reasons for writing and communicating online.

They claim they are dispensing value in a kind of knowledge-log "how-to" format, but as this genre of blogging multiplies, the sites look to me like little more than human-written, SEO-focused link farms, one step away from machine-generated link farms. Where is the real value in that?

Where I will stand in this new wash-out is with the commons, the spaces where real people talk, where conversations are alive with an energy of their own. The interfaces I will build for these communities and cybercultures will be interfaces that allow patterns of use to co-create the interface structures themselves.

The most creative, edgy projects I want to work on compulsively on my own time will not just employ user-centered design. They will allow social network structures to literally create their own designs.

In part two on this topic, I offer a visual snapshot into the kinds of blog-based sites I design, build, and often, host. One got 2,500 hits in its first 48 hours online. Others get very little traffic, because they are e-books I'm committed to maintaining as part of our common online library. Others are simply labors of love, my own contribution to the "real."

September 23, 2006 in Portfolio, Projects, Web Design, Web/Tech, Weblogs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

September 22, 2006

Montana Journalism Review: Ethical issues between blogging and journalism

I just heard a terrific NPR "All Things Considered" piece on George Orwell's "Politics and the English Language," and since that essay and Orwell's other writings influenced my piece in the Summer 2006 Montana Journalism Review below, it seemed like a good time to post this up here. The odd numbers floating in the text are references to the Endnotes at the very end of the document.

Here's the full bib citation:

Boese, C. (2006) "Challenging the Power Structure." Montana Journalism Review. Summer 2006, Number 35. pp. 8-10.


Challenging the Power Structure

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell

By Christine Boese

Picture the prototypical American "town square," the idealistic vision of Jeffersonian democracy: gathering places that people used to pass through almost every day, places that were the center of community life. Announcements and ideas were disseminated in these spaces. Anyone could set up a soapbox and start talking, although, as Clem Work has found in his research into the enforcement of the Alien and Sedition Act in Missoula in the early 20th century, there were very real attempts to squelch certain kinds of talk in some public squares.

Where do people gather to participate in their communities now? Aside from street festivals and parades, the few civic gatherings that remain take place in restricted or private spaces, in schools, churches, shopping malls, sports arenas. We have protections in the Constitution not only for speech, but also for the right to assemble. Activists of many stripes are bemoaning the loss of the true "commons," spaces that are set aside as the public domain, shared spaces that belong to all.

Journalists often have an explicit goal to cover community activities, and as such, they monitor and report on what happens in the "commons." But as the commons disappear, more often than not, journalists seek entry into the private spaces where decisions that affect communities are made. One unintended result of this shift is that journalists focus less on their communities and instead become willing satellites circling a class of power brokers, somewhat like the courtiers during Shakespeare's time.

A journalist has an ethical obligation to go where people are exercising their right to assemble, to monitor and cover the community, even if that community is a "global village." While face-to-face commons are disappearing, there still are places where people gather, discussing the events that affect their lives, participating in democracy in a most direct way.

And in the online "blogosphere," people are gathering. They're writing and editing their own customized interactive "newspapers" with headline readers and research they've done on their own, weighing and analyzing, making up their own minds instead of letting some editor they never voted for in the employ of some mass media conglomerate tell them what to think.

While the term "blog" was accepted into the Merriam Webster dictionary in 2004,1 few people profess to know very much about weblogs or the blog movement. If they do have an impression, it's often of self-obsessed teenagers putting too much private information online, or of anonymous and irresponsible talk radio-style ranting of the far right and left.

The problem is that blog software and the blog movement are two very different things. Blog software is a tool that can be used for a wide range of purposes. The "blog movement" is a social phenomenon having a very real impact at this moment in history.

The vast majority of what's being put online using blog software has very little to do with the "blog movement" per se. There are cooking recipe group blogs. About.com was converted to blog software several years ago. The University of Minnesota library is giving students blog space for learning, a project called UThink.2 Harvard Law School is using blogs to supplement teaching and discussions on legal issues.3 I have a poetry blog, my own idiosyncratic Norton Anthology, if you will.4

I often tell people that blog software is a poor person's content management system. It's like an empty coffee cup. What you pour into the cup is only bound by the limits of your imagination.

The database behind blog software is a terrific tool to hold all kinds of information for collaborative interactive access. I believe blog software will gobble up the entire Web because of the power of syndication (RSS) and headline feed readers.5

The "blog movement" is another thing altogether, and it's having considerable impact on journalism and journalistic ethics.

What the blog movement really does is reclaim the public commons for something that could approximate participatory democracy. Bloggers are having an impact on politics in the United States, most prominently at the national level. Increasingly, with grassroots political organizing, a tool called "Meetups,"6 and citizen journalism, their impact is also beginning to be felt at state and local levels.

Why would journalists be leery of the blog movement? Perhaps its massive size 7 and cacophony of voices are off-putting. Unlike with the public square, interactive online spaces place no limits on the number of soapboxes, and interfaces make rude "interruptions" impossible. Headline feed readers assist in the sorting and editing process, and other evolving features online let readers know where the crowds are gathering in the commons, and what ideas are being discussed there.8 In that respect, the movement of crowds online resembles a political caucus, where participants vote with their feet.

A journalist wouldn't expect every participant at a public hearing to be credible and quotable, but most often I hear journalists dismissing blogs because all bloggers aren't credible or reliable sources. Why should they be? Would a journalist give prominence to and quote any person on the street, even the drunk that comes stumbling out of a bar?

This electronic commons is also a hybrid, because it's a publishing space as well as a social space, and that gives a different kind of dialogic voice to the movement. While one person at a public hearing may have a nutty reason for opposing a particular change in the city law, that person didn't used to have the power to publish that opinion and distribute it widely.

And that brings us to the most crucial issue between journalists and bloggers: power.

The folks who asked me to write this article probably expected me to discuss blogging codes of ethics like the excellent one found at cyberjournalist.net,9 or the "pledge" citizen journalists had to take at Dan Gillmor's now failed "Bayosphere" project.10

Or perhaps they wanted me to discuss the common complaint made by bloggers against mainstream media, that traditional media methods are too cloaked in a black box and could be ethically suspect, so members of the blogging community often advocate for holding themselves to higher standards of ethical transparency than the mainstream press currently follows.

Those are all important issues because they deal with accountability and corruption, but the reason they are concerned with accountability and corruption is power. Power corrupts. If social and political power were not in play in the day-to-day workings of the mainstream press AND the blogosphere, none of this would be an issue. Until now, mainstream media has been a fairly exclusive gatekeeper to those who hold power.

Journalists approach power brokers in exclusive places on behalf of their readers/listeners/viewers. They must work with their feet in two worlds: the world of the power brokers, and the world of the ordinary people they serve. Corruption and serious ethical lapses in journalism usually happen when a power broker convinces a journalist to use the power of communication in service of the broker instead of the people. Journalists can be targets of such seductions just as surely as politicians can, because they sit at choke points of power, the power of the filter that says, "This gets published this way," and "this doesn't get published at all." There are people who would like to influence that filter for their own benefit. A journalist may even see a way to personally benefit by influencing the filter.

And so long as the world determined and defined by that set of filters is the only game in town, that world rules.

But then along come the bloggers. The blog movement has risen up in open rebellion against the common practices of mainstream media in a self-appointed role as a check and balance against a non-elected, non-governmental entity that nonetheless wields great power. One major sector of the blogosphere devotes itself entirely to media criticism.

Why should bloggers have any power over huge media entities? Why should words disseminated over cyberspace, the words of millions of bloggers, amount to anything except a rising chorus of babble? If ethics are about how one uses power responsibly according to a set of values based on something other than personal gain, would bloggers need ethics if they had no real power?

A peculiar thing is happening to ordinary people in the United States. They may be participating in the public commons in cyberspace on their own time, but their employers are becoming interested in monitoring what they have to say. Unlike when you speak words into the air, words uttered in cyberspace live forever in the ethers, in Google's long memory. And some people who have signed their names to their words online are losing their jobs over what they have written.

Generally, one would assume the First Amendment right to free speech and freedom to assemble would cover a person in such instances. However, employers who would restrict or monitor employee speech acts in cyberspace could seemingly respond, "Why of course you have freedom of speech. You are free to speak all you want, just as you also are free to not work here."

Bloggers, dissenting radio stations with significant audiences but few advertisers, and divergent voices can be seen as a threat by powerful people who are willing to use their power to restrict such voices. Perhaps that's because, as the writers of the U.S. Constitution understood, speech itself is powerful, simply the power of a voice speaking its truth. The kings and lords of our world amass power and wealth at levels that are hard to imagine, yet it appears some of them tremble in the face of free and dissenting speech.

What, then, is the most ethical act a person can engage in right now? What would that radical pamphleteer Thomas Paine have done? Many journalists decry the fact that a number of bloggers are not using their real names and instead adopt pseudonyms on their sites. This, they say, is a lapse in ethics and it undermines the credibility of these sites.

Bloggers, on the other hand, have to find a way to keep a steady paycheck while speaking their truths to power. Free speech uttered while warming one's hands over a barrel fire under a bridge has very little communicative reach. Anonymity may breed irresponsibility and possibly risk libel, but which ethical value is higher, getting the story out, or putting it away to never see the light of day because the price of putting your name on it is too high?

Think of what our world would be like if the words of many pseudonymous writers in our past had never reached us, including that war correspondent and socialist Eric Blair, an advocate for clear and concrete writing and against the political use of language to deliberately lie and obfuscate. He did that all the while lying about his own identity and hiding behind the fake name of George Orwell.


1 "'Blog' Is Runaway Word Of Year." Associated Press story at CBS News Dec.1 2004. Retrieved 3/11/06 at http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/12/01/print/main658433.shtml.

2 "Uthink: Blogs at the University Libraries." University of Minnesota Libraries. Retrieved 3/11/06 at http://blog.lib.umn.edu/.

3 "Weblogs at Harvard Law." Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law. Retrieved 3/11/06 at http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/.

4 Boese, C. Ed. (2006) "Headpiece Filled with Straw." Retrieved 3/12/06 at http://www.serendipit-e.com/hollow.

5 I recommend starting at Bloglines.com or FeedDemon.com to try out some of the most user-friendly headline feed readers.

6 Meetup: World's largest community of local Meetups, clubs, and groups!" Retrieved 3/14/06 at http://www.meetup.com.

7 At last count, Technorati.com says it is monitoring 30.5 million blogs (3/14/06).

8 Technorati.com is one of the most popular tools for finding out where the action is in the blogosphere on any given day. Other suitable sites are the Daypop Top 40 at Daypop.com and Blogpulse.com.

9 "A Blogger's Code of Ethics." Cyberjournalist.net. Retrieved 3/11/06 at http://www.cyberjournalist.net/news/000215.php.

10 "Bayosphere Citizen Journalist Pledge." Bayosphere. Retrieved 3/11/06 at http://bayosphere.com/cjregister.

September 22, 2006 in Published Research, Weblogs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

April 30, 2006

The Spirit of Paulo Freire in Blogland: Struggling for a Knowledge-Log Revolution

Originally published in the 2004 University of Minnesota edited collection: Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric, Community, and Culture of Weblogs.

Download FreireBlogland04.pdf

Reprinted here with permission.

Full Citation:

Boese, C. (2004). The Spirit of Paulo Freire in Blogland: Struggling for a Knowledge-Log Revolution. In L.J. Gurak, S. Antonijevic, L. Johnson, C. Ratliff, & J. Reyman (Eds.), Into the blogosphere: Rhetoric, community, and culture of weblogs. Retrieved April 30, 2006, from http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/the_spirit_of_paulo_freire.html.

By Christine Boese, Independent researcher

Weblogs and knowledge-logs, or “blogs” and “klogs,” have emerged into the post-dot.com bubble online world as a notable (and often non-commercial) social phenomenon. While some hear echoes of Web homepage voices from the mid-1990s, the blogging phenomenon during the Iraq war may have taken Web cybercultures in new directions. This qualitative and exploratory research considers the viability and social effects of the altered web page phenomenon of blogs and klogs as they affect the lives of information workers, in public Internet spaces, and with implications for private intranets. It combines ethnographic observations from a single case within the Iraq warblog phenomenon with the   standpoints and personal observations from the author’s professional experience launching a klog inside CNN Headline News shortly after the war. It seeks to gain insight into the utopian and often unnecessarily technologically deterministic promise of a knowledge-log revolution and find points where the movement falls far short of that promise. While knowledge-logs can appear as efficient groupware   tools for organizations, klog interface features allow political openings to change corporate cultures in ways most groupware never intended, with a goal of a dialogic, critical pedagogy through workers helping and teaching other workers outside the realm of “official policy.” Personal blog sites   of journalists in the employ of large, knowledge-commodity organizations such as Time Warner release this same tension into public spaces and reveal the very real disruption on a large scale that klogs can create on a small scale. Ideas and models presented by Paulo Freire and Michel de Certeau are used as a lens   for one possible interpretation of the events studied from March to November   2003.

The Other Side: Josh Kucera
March 09, 2003

An introduction

Welcome to my blog, all. First, to introduce myself and The Other Side. I am a freelance journalist based in Erbil, in Kurdish-controlled northern Iraq. I am new to the world of blogging, and I heartily thank Chris Boese, a friend of a friend whom I’ve never even met, for suggesting this to me and for setting up all the technical stuff.

I chose to call the blog The Other Side for a couple of reasons. One, I want to show the other side of the news. I don’t intend for this site to be a substitute for the ordinary media, but as a complement to it. You can get good information from the New York Times, BBC and Associated Press. But you won’t hear unvarnished opinion from a guy on the ground, or what ordinary days are like for the people here: about pornographic movie theaters,     tragic love stories or the sunset over Erbil.

Secondly, “the other side” refers to the land outside America’s borders, a big place that most Americans, even well educated ones, are not very familiar with. Reading the news about the Middle East or Indonesia or Venezuela is as about as meaningful as watching a game of Risk if you don’ know what the streets smell like there or what people eat. I hope this blog can be a small substitute for that sort of experience. . . .

That’ll be it for today … soon to come will be more reports, focusing on particular issues, relating particular incidents, etc. Stay tuned.  

Posted by Josh at 10:39 PM |Comments (16) |TrackBack (1)

Weblogs, or “blogs,” like the excerpt above, are a site of online communication that has sprung up in the margins around several forms of mainstream public discourses and professional communication practices, and in some cases become a deceptively powerful and somewhat erosive force in mainstream journalism--erosive in the sense that blogs have a dialogic and unobtrusive way of nibbling at established   mass media power bases, sometimes without institutional awareness.

As blogs enter mainstream public consciousness from the margins of the Internet where they originated, they bring a hidden and newly awakened army of interactive participants who may be experiencing the kinds of unsettling (to the powers that be) critical consciousness that is within the goals of an increasingly democratized culture such as Paulo Freire as an educator sought to foster. While blogs are now part and parcel of presidential campaigns, they really came into their own with the warblogs of the Iraq war in 2003.

For the purposes of this paper, a blog is defined as a regularly updated webpage using blogging software which functions as a database-driven, dynamic, content-focused shell (Carl, 2003, p 1, 3). Into that space, single authors or groups can take   any number of rhetorical stances and post creative and analytical source material and links, published with a reverse chronological order of most recent postings at the top, linked to a permanent archive through “permalinks.” While web pages are static, blogs are intended as part of an ongoing conversation through contextual “comments” bulletin boards attached to each post. Once installed, blogs require next to no technical knowledge to update and maintain. In addition, a social movement has sprung up around blogs, giving the technical   artifact meaning in a larger context, in what some call “neighborhoods” or “blog ecosystems.”

Klogs are simply blog software interfaces appropriated for company knowledge-management tools as a quick and easy, and participatory, content management system. Some firms may have IT departments build content management tools from scratch, often with uneven results due to usability difficulty. The sheer number of blog users online testifies to the ease of use for blog software, which may speak for their adoption for in-house klogs.

This qualitative and exploratory research considers the viability and social effects of the web page phenomenon of blogs and klogs as they affect the lives of information workers, in public Internet spaces with implications for private intranets. It combines ethnographic observations from a single case within the Iraq warblog phenomenon with the personal standpoints and observations from my professional experience launching a klog inside CNN Headline News shortly   after the war. It seeks to gain insight into the utopian and often unnecessarily technologically deterministic promise of a knowledge-log revolution and find   points where the movement falls far short of that promise.

The ethnographic methods employed in this qualitative study are informed by insider access to two separate sites. In each case, I participated on some level as a web designer and host and was an interested party in the blogs launched. While this may be seen as compromising the data gathered (in the case of the first site) or the personal observations (in the case of the second site), there is no other way that this information could have been obtained without being   one of the parties involved. The stories here would have remained invisible. But my standpoint must be claimed and foregrounded, from the perspective of   feminist standpoint theory as it affects scholarship (Rich, 1984), even while   distancing myself from the essentialism of identity politics to embrace a role more as a shifting cyborg hybrid from within the larger Time Warner organization (Haraway, 1991). According to Haraway, cyborgs are invisible and ubiquitous, "illegitimate offspring of militarism and patriarchal capitalism, not to   mention state socialism" (153), without loyalties or origins, "committed to partiality, irony, intimacy, and perversity, it is oppositional, utopian, and completely without innocence" (151). In adopting such a role, my perspective becomes part of the story.

The two sites studied will be described in terms of ideas of “critical consciousness” (Freire, 1973) and “textual poaching” (de Certeau, 1984) in an effort to unpack the complex interplay of events through an Iraq war blog on a large scale and the launch of an intranet klog on a small scale.

Blogs as a site for research

Because 2003 was such a seminal year for blogging and bloggers, there is currently   little existing scholarship on blogs or klogs, other than the vast echo system bloggers have created themselves, a system the mainstream media is beginning to cover as a “beat.” The blogosphere shrugged itself into existence   most notably following the events of September 11, 2001, with a very small but   intensely interested audience (Carl, 2003). When regular communications broke down in New York City, personal blogs tracked the concerns of the many laid   off or employed tech workers. As war began against Afghanistan, conventions of warblogging also began to emerge. With the crash of the space shuttle and   the resignation of Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, mainstream media became   aware of blogs. Blogs may have fully landed on the scholarly radar in 2003 with the Iraq warblogs and the Howard Dean blogs. Undoubtedly, more articles and collections like this one are in preparation as well.

The usual popular and trade press articles have appeared, evangelizing blogs   and klogs as the next hot new thing (Heyboer, 2003; Lewis, 2004; Rosencrance,   2004; Creamer, 2004). At least one master’s thesis has been written (Carl   2003). In addition to a careful history of the blogging phenomenon (drawn largely   from bloggers’ own histories), Christine Carl conducted a significant   survey of blogger demographics and practices with more than 1,400 respondents   in the United States, analyzing age, race, employment status, income, and education   level, among other factors.

Most conference panels on blogs also first appeared in 2003, with papers such   as Sybil Nolan’s from the proceedings at the Digital Arts and Culture   Conference in Melbourne, focusing on blogging’s impact on journalism (2003).

Jane B. Singer (2003) may have published the most complete study on the journalistic   aspect of blogging to date, focusing not on blogs per se, but on the challenge   to journalistic standards of professionalism by online journalists, particularly   bloggers. Still, given the general dearth of scholarship on blogging and bloggers,   there is more work to be done if blogging remains a significant social phenomenon   and not simply another Internet fad.

While also addressing the impact of warblogging on journalism, this paper attempts   to situate the movement in the larger context of information workers crafting   their products in both public and private work sites, and to look at the political   and social ramifications of those actions. As such, it considers all blogs to   some degree as knowledge-logs.

The Other Side and OJO: Iraq Warblogs

The primary site studied using ethnographic methods are the Iraqi warblogs   of Joshua Kucera and Carolina Podesta. Both journalists worked for several years   as foreign correspondents in Bosnia before going together to Erbil, Kurdistan,   in Northern Iraq just before the start of the war. I built and hosted these   sites, The Other Side, and OJO, on my domain, serendipit-e.com. Podesta’s   blog is entirely in Spanish, with a Google machine translation link on the side.   Because I don’t speak Spanish, my understanding of the zeitgeist of this   blog remains rough, although I did sense that something literary and quite transcendent   was occurring for Carolina and her legion of fans. I gathered additional data   through personal correspondence with both Kucera and Podesta before and throughout   the war. Both had laptops and satellite phones, as well as freelance contracts,   Kucera with TIME magazine, Podesta with an Argentine news service. While training   the journalists to use the software from a war zone, we discussed contingency   plans, but decided against outfitting the site for mobile blogging or “mo-blogging”   from cell phones. If their laptop access went down, they told me they had access   to the Internet at various cybercafes.



Lest you think everyone in the Middle East hates America... I've had the     Big Mac there, and it's not bad. This restaurant is in Suleymaniya, there     is also a fake McDonald's advertisement in the soccer stadium in Erbil.


Posted by Josh at 12:11 PM |Comments (0) |TrackBack (0)

I first met Josh Kucera through a friend at work, and through him also met   Carolina Podesta, at the time his partner. I was working for CNN Headline News,   writing the afternoon on-screen headline ticker Mondays through Fridays. In   the time leading up to the start of the Iraq war, I was watching colleagues   prepare for the “embedding process,” going to D.C. and completing   Pentagon training for chemical weapons and basic military rules in order to   travel with the units in which they would be reporting. Remembering the restrictions   on reporters during the first Gulf War, I was apprehensive about the embedding   process, even with good journalists in the units. I worried that their reports   would be censored by restricted satellite phone access, or worse, unconsciously   biased.

My reasons for offering to build blogs for Josh and Carolina were personal   as much as anything. I wanted to know I had a source on the ground in Iraq that   was independent of U.S. military control. I wanted to build their sites because   I wanted to read their blogs. At the time I had built several other blogs using   Movable Type, and I’d been following the warblogging movement closely.   It seemed that the most prominent names among the warbloggers were people in   the U.S., processing and reprocessing war coverage at a distance. “This   isn’t right,” I thought, “Independent, experienced reporters   in Iraq need to be blogging during this war. That’s what I want to read.”

About that same time, my employer, CNN, asked video journalist Kevin Sites,   already in Iraq, to stop posting to his popular blog. That sealed my decision.   Josh asked for permission to keep the blog from TIME magazine, since he had   an exclusive contract. TIME said as long as it was non-commercial and he wasn’t   posting things TIME wanted to publish, he could create the blog. The same company   that owns CNN, Time Warner, owns TIME magazine.

My immediate supervisors at CNN Headline News knew I built and kept blogs,   but given my on-air anonymity and relative unimportance to the news gathering   process within our organization, my extracurricular activities weren’t   seen as a conflict to the performance of my duties as a ticker writer. I largely   refrained from commenting about my employer on any of my personal blogs out   of ethical considerations.

Textual Poaching and Critical Consciousness

This research pulls together two frames, the Marxist radical pedagogical approach   of Paulo Freire, who sought venues for dialogic teaching and learning outside   traditional classrooms, with the postmodern cultural theorist Michel de Certeau,   who wrote on subversive ways ordinary people resist being defined by their workplaces   and by a consumer society. I believe these two lenses dovetail, as Freire escapes   the often totalizing frame of Marxism with his emphasis on dialogic co-learning,   and de Certeau’s writing on everyday practices can empower a more contingent   style of democratized knowledge-making in blogs, with a liberatory sense of   resistance even when workers are oppressed or dominated. Both look at what vibrates   outside of areas of rigid control and professional editing.

While weblogs and knowledge-logs can appear as efficient groupware tools for   organizations, klog interface features seem to allow political openings to change   corporate cultures in ways most groupware never intended, through a goal of   a dialogic, critical pedagogy of workers helping and teaching other workers   outside the realm of “official policy.” Given the unvarnished nature   of such in-house knowledge making, institutional controls on worker’s   minds and voices can be undermined, creating a tension between officially sanctioned   controls and policies and contingent and disciplinary knowledge or professional   expertise (Friedson, 1986; Gilbert & Mulkay, 1984; Edwards & Mercer,   1987; Geisler, 1994). Personal blog sites of journalists in the employ of large,   knowledge-commodity organizations such as Time Warner release this same tension   into public spaces and reveal the very real disruption on a large scale that   klogs can create on a small scale. As another journalist covering the war, I   was reading warblogs as my own kind of public knowledge-log, to expand my knowledge   of the subject I was covering by reading the postings of independent colleagues   in the field.

Michel de Certeau, in The Practice of Everyday Life, is concerned with workplace   practices that live in the margins and engage in a kind of “textual poaching,”   as he writes:


Reading introduces an “art” which is anything but passive. …Imbricated     within the strategies of modernity (which identify creation with the invention     of a personal language, whether cultural or scientific), the procedures of     contemporary consumption appear to constitute a subtle art of “renters”     who know how to insinuate their countless differences into the dominant text.     … Today this text no longer comes from a tradition. It is imposed by     the generation of a productivist technocracy. It is no longer a referential     book, but a whole society made into a book, into the writings of the anonymous     law of production. (1984, p. xxii)

The practices of bloggers seem most clearly described in this quotation. While   de Certeau’s study has to look hard to discover how the seemingly passive   readers find ways to “poach” on the dominant texts as a form of   resistance, blogging during the Iraq war seemed to bring the resistance into   the open, as a more open rebellion. As a practicing journalist, Josh Kucera   was not typically someone in such open rebellion, although many warbloggers   outside of Iraq were. As we will see later, he resists becoming a “poster   child” for the independent media movement. Even so, with his quiet and   observant posts from Erbil, Josh was “insinuating countless differences   into the dominant text.” Ironically, in my position from inside CNN Headline   News, covering the war on the headline ticker at the same time, I was also most   clearly implicated and complicit with the “anonymous law of production”   de Certeau mentions above. I was part of the dominant text the bloggers were   resisting, one of its many authors. Given the contradictions I was experiencing,   I had no choice but to turn to Haraway (1991), to see myself as the cyborg hybrid   inside the belly of the “productivist technocracy.”

CNN Headline News Knowledge-Log

That cyborg sensibility led me, concurrently, to propose and build a knowledge-log   for the Headline News intranet, as a way to share this empowering interface   with my colleagues, so that THEY could share contingent knowledge, lore, and   professional practices that helped them produce excellent work day in and day   out. This is the second site studied in this paper, not through formal research   methods, but merely reported from my personal observations as an advocate and   klog evangelist. This work could not be called “ethnographic” because   I did not have permission to undertake such a study in the newsroom, and even   if I had had such permission, I was far too involved as an advocate to be able   to step back from it with an ethnographer’s eye.

I wanted to plumb beneath the surface of this respectable and reasonable practice   of knowledge management in the Information Age to find the contingent practices   in a workplace where the “widgets” are information products created   by knowledge workers and knowledge-makers, through the shaping and social use   of the information products in their workplaces and at large. I wanted to try   out the effects of democratization and subversion on this process of keeping   a klog, and in doing so, possibly learn ways workplace practices could one day   be further affected by the force of these software systems.

I also saw a visible (and documentable) clash of cultures between old and new   media—perhaps made even more acute than it might be at more “typical”   large corporations because the primary, external “product” or knowledge   commodity of Time Warner embodies almost in its entirety the assumptions of   broadcast or mass media, often unreflexively, as stated or even unstated truisms.   Before coming to CNN, I held certain beliefs about “old media” from   my dissertation research (Boese, 1998), which focused on power struggles between   the creators of the show “Xena: Warrior Princess” and the interactive   online fan community, seen through an ethnography in that fandom culture (populated   with active textual poachers as well).

On the other side of the fence, from inside the world of mass media production,   I was prepared to have those beliefs challenged. Instead I was surprised to   find them reinforced. The mass media model of communication appears so deeply   ingrained among so-called “old media” broadcast writers that it   is nearly unheard of in the newsroom to question issues relating to “good   news judgment,” “lowest common denominator” programming, and   demographic assumptions about 18- to 35-year-olds. Perhaps I was naïve.   Scholarly literature seems well aware of a “tension between the news media   and the discipline of cultural studies,” according to Sybil Nolan (2003).   I had left the field of journalism to spend 15 years in academia. Perhaps because   I’d changed over the years, I assumed journalistic assumptions about audiences   and interactivity would have changed also.

These are my personal observations, however, and not part of a formal study   of newsroom cultures. I made these observations as I studied the audience for   the klog I was building, as part of the design process. And in the end, these   observations were reinforced when I went on to launch the klog. The most startling   thing I found was that these broadcast writers (the klog was primarily to serve   newsroom writers and copyeditors) envisioned viewers as passive recipients of   media products, and they also constructed THEMSELVES as passive recipients of   media products, despite the fact that they were actively writing and shaping   those media products every day at work. The anonymity of the “voice”   with which they were conditioned to write seemed to preclude finding a voice   with which to speak up on a klog.

The second thing I encountered was widespread technophobia or technological   ignorance relating to the Internet. One copyeditor told me web browsers still   were not on most CNN newsroom computers in 1996, when a co-worker showed him   the Internet for the first time. The newsroom still relies on mainframe-based   research tools and writing spaces at the time of this writing in 2004. While   I was able to easily teach Josh and Carolina (who speaks and writes basic English,   but I speak no Spanish) to use the input form interfaces of their blogs by email   from Atlanta to Kurdistan, I struggled to train colleagues face-to-face in the   newsroom to feel at ease posting to our intranet klog.

Bruce Garrison (2001) has studied the diffusion of online information technologies   in newspaper newsrooms, looking at critical mass and diffusion theory. Although   his study pre-dates the appearance of blogs and klogs, I compared his data to   the “diffusion of technology” anecdotes shared by my colleagues   who had been on site since the early 1990s. It does appear that the Headline   News newsroom at least (and anecdotally, the entire Turner building in Atlanta)   integrated online research tools somewhat behind the curve reported by Garrison.   I also observed colleagues’ reluctance to explore online research tools   on their own, as evidenced by the slow adoption of the beta “Google News”   algorithm tool, as well as slow discovery of the handy Google toolbar, which   also blocks annoying pop-up ads.


War Begins
    The Other Side
    March 17, 2003


War Panic in Erbil


Today is the first official day of war panic in Erbil. Yesterday everything     looked much like it has since I got here. Today many shops are closed, there     are fewer cars in the street and people tell me their neighbors are fleeing     the city for towns further towards the Iranian border. My translator's family     all left for their hometown of Koy Sanjak, which is closer to the Iraqi lines     but which they feel is less of a target. Shop owners are emptying their stores,     putting their stuff in more secure locations in case there are looting during     the war.


Most people are afraid of chemical weapons. As you know, this area was attacked     hundreds of times by chemical weapons during the Anfal campaign of the 1980s.     The most notorious incident, in Halabja, was 15 years ago this weekend. Over     7,000 people died in that one attack. Now people here are afraid that it will     happen again. But people aren’t preparing much. Very few people have     gas masks – other than the foreigners, of course. There is a military     market here in Erbil, and I went a couple of weeks ago to stock up. I bought     four German-made masks (for me, Carolina, our driver and translator) for $150,     a little out of the range of ordinary Iraqis. The dealer told me the only     locals who bought the masks were the richest ones. “The poor people     want to die,” he said. “The rich people want to live 200 years.”     One political party today was giving out leaflets on how to make a homemade     gas mask. You take flour, coal and salt, wrap it in a cloth and hold it over     your mouth. . . .


Posted by Josh at 05:46 PM |Comments (2) |TrackBack (0)

Both Josh's and Carolina’s blogs began getting heavy publicity during   the course of the war. Carolina’s site was featured on Argentine TV, so   traffic shot up to about 1,000 hits a day after her first week. It eventually   developed such an enduring presence (significant hits from areas beyond Argentina   as well, particularly Mexican domain names) that when she returned to Argentina   after the war, she got a contract to turn it into a book (2003b) and a conference   was held with the OJO blog as one of its central topics.

  Josh’s blog was in English, well written and visual, with respectable   citations from other blogs, leading up to the battle of Baghdad. Then it got   written up in The Boston Globe (Bray 2003), as the stories of the Baghdad Blogger,   Salam Pax, and the Back to Iraq blog sites put the issue on the national news   agenda. The Boston Globe article appeared to mock TIME, suggesting that the   writing and topics on Josh’s site were more immediate and compelling than   what TIME was publishing from him.

  The day after that article came out, March 25, 2003, TIME demanded Josh stop   posting to his blog, just as CNN’s Kevin Sites had also been forbidden   to post to his blog as it started gaining popular acclaim during the war. The   screenshot below shows Josh’s two final posts on the permanent site archive.




Figure 1: The Other Side, Joshua Kucera’s weblog. http://www.serendipit-e.com/otherside


Many may remember the flurry of blog stories on the eve of the “Battle   of Baghdad” in 2003. Salam Pax had stopped posting at Dear Raed and many   blogs echoed the fear that something had happened to him (he later re-emerged,   safe). Kevin Sites and Joshua Kucera had been asked to suspend posting (after   the conclusion of the formal part of the war, Kevin Sites left CNN and is once   again posting to his blog). Sean Paul Kelly at Agonist.org was accused of plagiarism.   The cessation of Josh’s active posting was a disappointing development.   Josh’s style of first-person observation about the price of gas or the   porn movie houses open in Erbil had ruined me for the rehashing and linking   styles of many of the US-based warblogs. Traffic on Josh’s site shot through   the roof as its closing was written up prominently in The Wall Street Journal,   on the MSNBC site, and in a depth analysis article in The Chicago Tribune (Rose   & Cooper 2003, Femia 2003, Ryan 2003). Both MSNBC and the BBC had embraced   the warblog movement and were hosting warblogs by their own correspondents on   their official sites. For Time Warner, and CNN, a division of that company,   it was as if the warblog movement did not exist, despite perfunctory news coverage   of warblogging as a “gee whiz” tech story.

  So while I was putting in six-day weeks, 10-hour days as part of our intensive   Iraq war coverage, I was also caught up in the ongoing drama that saw mainstream   media’s war coverage challenged by this upstart blog phenomenon. The challenge   was to try to make meaning from conflicts between the two different universes   of discourse, one severely restricted by mass media assumptions about the patriotic   attitudes of US audiences, and the other, in the blogosphere, situated much   more firmly in the discourse of international media coverage, which differed   significantly from U.S. war coverage in its skepticism toward the U.S. point   of view.

  The frame I found most helpful placed these divergent journalistic endeavors   as rhetorically epistemic knowledge-making, a macro version with corporate broadcast   journalism content contrasted with international warblogs, echoed on a smaller   level with klogs, and with the tensions and frustrations in the delayed launch   of my intranet klog. The lines were starting to blur, once I considered journalism   and professional communication in blogs and klogs as a commodity and site for   interactive and contingent knowledge products and knowledge making.

Paulo Freire and Empowered Knowledge-Making

  Let’s step back and look at blogs and klogs in terms of this interesting   dance with corporate entities, some of which see knowledge management as asset   management for the Information Age. Ostensibly, blogs and klogs would seem to   help corporate entities to “manage” the “intellectual assets”   of a company in an information-based economy, particularly in the context of   knowledge workers, but who is managing whom? It has been said that companies   are increasingly concerned that the greatest assets of the firm are walking   out the door every night at the end of their shifts. The wolf in sheep’s   clothing in the dance could be the knowledge-logs that seek to create artifacts   based on those information assets. The contingent knowledge disseminated through   both intranet company klogs and more public, journalistic or topical extracurricular   blogs of journalists or other experts, writers, and communicators create a kind   of knowledge commodity that exists outside conventional economic systems of   value. If understood as formal publishing ventures, there is a model for thinking   of blogs and klogs, the kind of model that would put TIME magazine in the right   for protecting its own publishing venture from a rival or competing publishing   venture by shutting down Josh’s blog. But are these formal publishing   ventures?

  The late Paulo Freire was a Brazilian educator wrestling with the problem of   how to bring democracy to a colonized and oppressed people who had never in   the better part of their cultural memory known anything like democracy. Literacy   was not the only problem. Empowerment and responsibility for self-governance   had to come from somewhere. Rather than accept traditional models of teaching   and learning, Freire saw that those models, such as the “banking model   of education,” were actually working against the larger goals of democracy.   From these realizations, he developed a Pedagogy of the Oppressed, his most   famous work, and also the concept of “critical consciousness” or   "conscientização,” the goal of his model of education.   This concept involved being an active participant in one’s life, not merely   a spectator, making choices rather than oppressed by the illusion of choice.   This he saw as a key to an open society (Freire, 1973).

  If worker brain power is the warehouse capital of the Information Age, it certainly   seems reasonable for a company to develop its own intellectual and knowledge-based   assets, also as a way to preserve and document processes and policies developed   by employees, the information products of employees, to guard against the loss   of these assets should a worker leave the company. Worker intellectual development,   continuing education, and collaboration all seem to speak to the value to a   company of fostering an active and thinking work force. Intranet klogs, which   dialogically explore aspects of one’s work product, team projects, processes,   and so on, would seem to be a valuable tool to refine such workplace assets.   It would appear, then, that Paulo Freire’s goals and the goals of those   creating software to support workplace knowledge management would be in alignment.

  While klogs can craft a form of groupware to assist in this knowledge management,   they can also appeal to business hierarchies that want to know what their employees   are thinking and doing, that may even view these klogs as a tool of company   surveillance. Indeed, in both the journalistic articles and the klog discussion   groups, this issue is often addressed and cited at times as a reason for a less   than enthusiastic response from one’s co-workers when it comes to participating   in the klog, particularly in workplace cultures where workers are afraid to   speak up in their own voices, even if fears of reprisal are unintended by management   and not at all overt, as I found with my fellow journalists at CNN Headline   News. In a time of recession and constant corporate cutbacks, where many are   doing the jobs of more than one person already, most workers keep their heads   down and say little because one never knows if an unvarnished opinion may hit   some random boss the wrong way. Many in the larger corporate workplace have   also witnessed higher paid co-workers in their 50s with considerable intellectual   capital for the company jettisoned by cost-cutting managers looking to fill   those positions with younger people on smaller salaries. In these situations,   it would appear that those greater intellectual assets are not valued.

La perruque, or the Wig

  Some companies take possessiveness of worker intellectual products a step further,   claiming all items on a worker’s hard drive should the employee leave   the company, for instance. Marshall McLuhan (1963) demonstrates that a hard   drive, like a book, is an extension of the worker’s mind. How much of   a worker’s intellectual activity can a company reasonably claim to own?   If telecommuting, can the company lay claim to all writing one does at home?   In the case of personal blogs of journalists, we see Time Warner was threatened   by the non-professional publishing activities of Kevin Sites and Joshua Kucera,   implying that a different economy or scale of value is superceding money in   this marketplace. But those are the kinds of instances savvy lawyers might think   to cover in a standard non-compete clause. What if Josh were writing letters   home to his family, writing many of the same kinds of things that did appear   in his blog? Could he keep a password-protected blog, a private and personal   intranet, ostensibly for his family and friends (and a few hundred others) to   access? I offered to host such a site, but Josh worried he might get in trouble   for that and didn’t want to risk it. Is it the intellectual content of   Josh’s brain that Time Warner coveted, or the fact that the publication   site allowed him to reach an audience that hurt the future viability of one   of the largest media chains in the world? Or was it his point of view, standard   for blogs, what we might call “first person idiosyncratic,” in such   a marked contrast to the depersonalized style of TIME reporting?

  Michel de Certeau writes of a diversionary workplace tactic called ‘”la   perruque,” or “the wig” within the sometimes invisible “arts   of practice.” Something of a ruse, “the wig” is


…the worker’s own work disguised as work for his [sic] employer.     It differs from pilfering in that nothing of material value is stolen. It     differs from absenteeism in that the worker is officially on the job. …The     worker who indulges in la perruque actually diverts time (not goods, since     he uses only scraps) from the factory for work that is free, creative, and     precisely not directed toward profit. In the very place where the machine     he must serve reigns supreme, he cunningly takes pleasure in finding a way     to create gratuitous products whose sole purpose is to signify his own capabilities     through his work and to confirm his solidarity with other workers or his family.     (1984, pp. 24-26)

In other words, “the wig” is a form of poaching from the workplace   by only appropriating products that are to some extent invisible and unvalued   or undervalued in the workplace. In an information marketplace peopled by knowledge   workers, the “scraps” that the worker diverts come from the firings   of her own mind, just as Josh’s blog consisted of the “leftovers”   that he perceived TIME did not want to publish. Josh told me that TIME was not   so much concerned with getting a first shot at his best observations as much   as it didn’t want anyone else to be able to see his cast-offs. The reach   of Internet publishing through blog software gave these seemingly “gratuitous   products” a value outside of the conventional system of money or information   economics. The “scraps” Josh used were whatever happened to catch   his eye outside of his more formal tasks. At issue are boundaries, partitions   information workers would seemingly have to erect inside their own brains between   work for their employer and work for themselves. Perhaps a reporter might say,   “TIME magazine is renting my eyeballs right now. No one else is allowed   to use them for the moment…” New boundaries are coming up for negotiation.

  One could even argue in a klog context that Freire’s “critical consciousness”   is a trait that is undervalued in the workplace, along with a worker’s   ability to make knowledge, to take scraps and develop truths about workplace   practices, best professional communication practices, disciplinary practices,   and lore. But here is the subversion of unedited and interactive blogs and klogs.   They live in a place at the intersections of a number of different border regions,   between expert and contingent knowledge-making, between disciplinary boundaries,   between populist and elitist systems of access to research or technology or   capital or power, boundaries between professional life and home life, not to   mention, with telecommuting, physical boundaries between work and home (Friedson,   1986; Gilbert & Mulkay, 1984; Edwards & Mercer, 1987; Geisler, 1994).

  As blogs and klogs enter the mainstream from the margins, they bring along the   ruse of “the wig,” with dialogic and interactive participants who   may be experiencing the kinds of unsettling (to the powers that be) critical   consciousness that is within the goals of a more democratized technoculture   such as Paulo Freire as an educator sought to foster. Whether journalists are   publicly assisting other journalists through their public blogs or workers are   helping to train colleagues in internal klog contexts, an active critical awareness   supercedes the passive absorption of information or top-down policies.

  By design, blogs are oriented toward humanization and textual poaching with   active and dialogic co-participants rather than a passive audience. Klogs seemingly   appear to allow corporate entities to “manage” the “intellectual   assets” of a company in an information-based economy, particularly in   the context of knowledge workers. But intranet klogs and some of their more   public counterparts such as these knowledge products created by journalists   during the Iraq war have the potential to release voices as “humanized”   knowledge-makers with a claim on power that can force many institutions to change   with the force of awakened and empowered dialogue, creativity, and analytical   power, even as other institutions react strongly and resist change (a move both   described and discussed by Freire through his experiences in Brazil).

  While corresponding with Josh through our several weeks of notoriety before   the Battle of Baghdad, he told me something that I came to understand was very   important to him. He had worked as a freelancer in Bosnia for several years   before moving to Kurdistan to cover the war. After TIME shut the blog down,   Josh was clearly disturbed by the anti-mass media ranting and the level of anger   against big media corporations in the comments field of his blog. He strongly   resisted becoming a poster child for the independent journalism movement. Josh   said he had been trained to focus on the story and not to become the story.   Still, he said, in four years working as a freelancer overseas, he had not ever   gotten as much feedback and interest in his work as he had in the weeks of the   Iraq war through his blog. His writing was being published by one of the largest   circulation newsmagazines in the West, yet his blog audience cared about him,   worried about him, gave his work constant dialogue and feedback. He was blown   away by it.

  I know I was affected by it as well, but in a different way. I’d never   met Josh or Carolina face to face, but as the war moved closer to Erbil, I found   myself worrying about them, involved in their stories, in their blogs. If I   didn’t hear from them by email regularly, I became very anxious. There   was a human face, a level of personal involvement, with war correspondents breaking   through the impersonal barrier of the affectation of the journalistic voice.

The Practices of Blogs and Klogs

  In developing my intranet klog for Headline News, I turned to helpful klog evangelist   sites online such as Phil Wolff’s "a klog apart.” Wolff has   undertaken a form of dialogic, critical pedagogy to help klog evangelists in   organizations teach co-workers to communicate in blog-format, also looking at   issues involving teaching colleagues to write, not simply with words, but through   posting images, diagrams, audio and video clips, etc. In quite a number of posts,   he sounds very much like a composition teacher, seeking ways to encourage and   empower writers, to help co-workers not feel self conscious, to help them find   their voices. Without teachers and classrooms, the atmosphere for learning and   sharing invokes not only Paulo Freire, but also Peter Elbow (1973), in Writing   Without Teachers.



Figure 2: Phil Wolff’s “a klog apart”   site at http://www.dijest.com/aka

Wolff collects tips and tricks and future ideas for use of klog software from   his network of correspondents and contributors. These ideas range from the practical   to the theoretical to speculative “what if” projections and software   wish lists, like one big collaborative klog-brainstorming session. One post   suggests klogs can be used to help generate PowerPoint presentations. Another   addresses literacy problems in the workplace. One has tips for would-be writing   coaches. Another, ideas for empowering shy writers by developing mixed media   klogs with audio clips, video clips, captured white board graphics, etc. with   the idea that different thinking and learning styles will express themselves   in different ways.

  Ethical and workplace power and politics are also discussed quite bluntly on   “a klog apart’ and on the klog Yahoo! discussion group, including   fears of panoptic surveillance by supervisors (Foucault 1977).

  Peter Elbow would likely recognize these klog evangelists as leaders of a dialogic   writing workshop without teachers, with co-teachers, outside of traditional   classrooms. But this is also something more—something like the Freire   model as a response to oppression, a kind of oppression Freire himself would   be hesitant to name as such, centered as it is in the overprivileged West. But   if spontaneous and dialogic writing workshops are springing up in this medium,   is this not what Freire sought to foster outside the socially limiting and often   authoritarian spaces of traditional classrooms? As a tool that not only poaches   the texts of the mass media and business knowledge-making, but also discourses   of the classroom, klogs as envisioned by Phil Wolff have a very auspicious beginning,   at least in theory.

  On the other hand, I can also describe the difficulties I had once my Headline   News intranet klog launched, well after the formal end of the war. Management   decided to hold six weeks of writing and script coding seminars conducted by   copyeditors, attendance required. I adjusted the klog I had built to specifically   support handouts and discussions from the seminars and was given the seventh   week in the schedule to hold klog training seminars.

  The klog that I launched had anything but an auspicious beginning. Despite enthusiasm   from management and my own evangelizing, writers and copyeditors seemed ill   equipped to use it for anything except as a passive reference for handouts.   I billed the klog as a place to talk about the craft of writing and ways to   make our work better. People at Headline News are very ambitious and are always   training to move to their next position, often taking overtime, double shifts,   or overnight shifts to do it. Even so, they seemed not to have ways to talk   about craft, about what made writing good or bad for our particular context   and audience. Writers complained orally that copyeditors were unable tell them   what they were doing wrong, would instead just say, “this script sucks”   and leave it at that. I’d hoped our klog could address these issues in   script workshops. These are journalists, I thought. Writing is what they do.   Surely they will have a lot to say.

  Instead I came to understand the very real barriers against posting to our klog,   barriers ingrained in the CNN workplace culture and probably many workplace   cultures. It wasn’t just fear of reprisals. People in low-end positions   striving to move up can be afraid to speak because it can hurt their chances   at promotion, despite honest management encouragement. Most could talk about   facts in stories but did not have a vocabulary to talk about writing, across   all ranks. These are also people who are exhausted, overworked, dragging themselves   through stressful television shifts that push them to the limit. After their   show gets off the air, they head out the door or to another training session.   Finally, to a person, I could not find anyone who was not intimidated by technology   and the Internet, even people who work in the control room or route video through   complex series of feeds in the CNN system. To post is to have a voice, however   it may be socially constructed, and to have confidence in that voice. I encountered   people who froze up staring at the “Post to Blog” button on our   klog, and those who thought they would never be able to figure out the blog   in the first place, despite working at terminals every day.

  Our klog still has value as a database, a shell to hold training materials,   style guides, and official policies. It is more easily searched or cross-referenced   than the file on the mainframe that holds these materials. But that is top-down   communication. The grassroots empowerment with our klog never happened. As an   alternative, I tried to interest friends in the newsroom in creating personal   blogs, offering to help, still puzzled at the reticence of professional writers   in developing an outlet for what they did best. My best guess at why so few   took up my offer has to do with the learned impersonal tone of mass media journalism,   a tone that erases the author’s point of view. These are writers who spend   every day at work trying to erase their biases and points of view, to make their   writing voice sound like the voice of the anchor of the show they are on.

  How do groups evolve and contribute when shaping and being shaped by blog interfaces?   Partly the answer to that question can be found in the sudden rise to power   of the blog movement as a social force as compared to static web pages or pages   merely generated from databases, such as I studied in my research into the Xenaverse,   the constellation of fan web sites around the television show “Xena: Warrior   Princess,” (1998). While it may be too soon to tell, given the complexity   of forces arrayed within interfaces and cultures, I do believe the interactive   interface features unique to the blog social movement deserve a good part of   the credit for harnessing dialogic energy on the Web. I am not taking a technologically   deterministic stance when I say this, however. The interface features minus   the social movement could not create the same force alone, as Phil Wolfe has   written of in “a klog apart” and as I found out for myself with   the Headline News klog. It seems to be bit of a “chicken and egg”   question of which came first, the interactive features or the social movement   that rises up and is empowered by the interactive features. Bruce Garrison’s   (2001) study into a “critical mass” in the diffusion of online information   technologies in newsrooms also shows how gradual increases in adoption rate   can create a snowball social effect.

  The Xenaverse was an empowered social movement that existed before the blog   interfaces became available. The connected communities and regular posters and   commenters around some of the most popular blogs, like Boing Boing or Kuro5hin   don’t have to be goaded into participating. They are people who seem to   feel they have something to say, and are technically adept enough to see how   useful the simple web forms can be. Yet offline groups don’t migrate into   online spaces nearly as well, no matter what opportunities exist, or how easy   they are to use, or even by virtue of the fact that the people in the group   are already skilled professional writers.


  A Business 2.0 newsletter article considered the viability of “Management   by Blog?” (2003) and came to the conclusion that, despite many strong   proponents, the klog movement has not caught on yet. The article notes that   companies are still more likely to incorporate blog features into public customer   service web sites (such as Macromedia has done) than they are to use it as a   method for workgroup teams to pool thoughts, progress reports, documentation   for projects, etc, as another tool for computer support for collaborative groups,   in other words. Why the reticence? It may be because blogging grew up from a   grassroots social movement and not necessarily a dot.com business plan seeking   venture capital. Blogs didn’t show up on business radar until Google bought   Blogger. It could also reflect worker resistance to groupware blog tools, as   I found at Headline News.

  The Business 2.0 article claims that the move of Google buying Blogger alone   gives the business knowledge-management klog camp such force that it can only   be the next big thing. On the other hand, anyone who follows the often-uncritical   hype of Business 2.0 has heard that story before. Many who have tried to launch   company intranet blogs realize that a bigger problem can be training and levels   of participation with harried and overworked colleagues, issues that Phil Wolff   at “a klog apart’ is more than prepared to address. I’m not   ready to declare such an easy victory for intranet-based knowledge logs primarily   because the borders and gates of intranets are still deeply affected by corporate   cultures built on information control, and are too rigidly exclusive for concepts   of information-sharing, both by turf-guarding employees within competitive corporations,   and by turf-guarding corporations that would rather live with restrictive technology   and knowledge management tools than experience a more democratized workplace.  

  We can see how deeply these interests are threatened by blog interfaces by looking   at what Time Warner did to attempt to control the flow of knowledge commodities   by its “intellectual assets.” Joshua Kucera was a freelancer, not   even a full employee of Time Warner, a distinction might has well have been   moot, since the issue was about leverage, power, and control of his intellectual   “scraps.” Also lost are the dialogues, the enrichment, the Freire-style   learning and growth that would ultimately improve knowledge products in the   workplace because certain topics are so off-limits they cannot be broached in   public discourse or on company intranets, except anonymously on “gripe”   blogs such as enronsucks.com and the like.

  Personal blog sites of journalists in the employ of large, knowledge-commodity   organizations such as Time Warner release the same tensions and conflicting   issues into public spaces and thus reveal the very real disruption on a large   scale that klogs can create on a small scale within organizations as voices   enter into dialogues rather than listen to the one-way monologues of policies,   of being told what to think, about in-house corporate processes or the role   of the Kurds in Erbil. However, as I found with the Headline News klog, there   are still many challenges to be overcome before off-line groups can successfully   migrate to klog-style interactions.

  As Paulo Freire set reflection, questioning, and dialogue as ideals in fostering   critical consciousness in Brazil, so also does the use of these same techniques   within a corporate environment let a genie out of a bottle. Freire discusses   how repression and backlash by elites are often the result of the “oppressed”   gaining too much power of voice and consciousness. While we are not seeing here   a military coup and repression as backlash such in Brazil, I do believe we are   seeing and will continue to see a backlash. Even so, the greatest counterforce   that keeps the genie from going back into the bottle may be what de Certeau’s   describes as the poaching technique of “la perruque,” “the   wig,” a worker’s own work disguised as work for his employer. This   is the site of cultural resistance I will be watching from my feminist cyborg   hybrid post as this phenomenon evolves, as a backlash drives some underground,   or at least, under the wig.


March 25, 2003


Goodbye for now


My editors have demanded that I stop posting to this site until the war ends.     And they pay the bills, so what can I do. Thanks everyone for reading, and     I hope to be back here soon. Peace, Josh.


Posted by Josh at 10:00 PM |Comments (33) |TrackBack (0)



Allbritton, C. (2003). Back in Iraq 2.0: Being a recounting of my journalistic   adventures concerning Iraq. Weblog. Retrieved May 20, 2003, from http://www.back-to-iraq.com/

Bakhtin, M. M. (1996). The dialogic imagination. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.

Boese, C. (1998). The ballad of the Internet nutball: Chaining rhetorical   visions from the margins of the margins to the mainstream in the Xenaverse.   (Doctoral dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute). Retrieved May 19,   2004, from http://www.nutball.com/dissertation.

Bray, H. (2003, May 24). On-the-spot blogs from war: Conflict in Iraq gives   rise to journalists' online diaries. The Boston Globe. pp. B9.

C. Carl. (2003). Bloggers and their blogs: A depiction of the users and usage of weblogs on the World Wide Web. (M.A. Thesis, Georgetown University). Retrieved May 19, 2004, from http://cct.georgetown.edu/thesis/ChristineCarl.pdf

Creaner, M. (2004, January 5). Employee weblogs: Employee blogs can be good for business. PR Week. 18.


de Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of   California Press.

Deuze, M. (2001, October). Online journalism: Modeling the first generation of news media on the World Wide Web. First Monday: Peer-reviewed journal on the Internet, 6(10). Retrieved March 19, 2004, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue6_10/deuze/index.html

Deuze, M. (2002). The Internet and its journalisms, Part I & II: A typology of online journalism. USC Annenberg Online Journalism Review. Retrieved May 19, 2004, from http://www.ojr.org/ojr/future/1026407729.php

Edwards, D., & N. Mercer. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Methuen.

Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. NY: Oxford University Press.

Femia, W. (Ed) (2003, March 26). Weblogs central: weblogs: The new tool. MSNBC.   Retrieved March 30, 2003, from http://www.msnbc.com/news/809307.asp

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Trans.   Alan Sheridan. London: Penguin.

Friedson, E. (1986). Professional powers: A study of the institutionalization   of formal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Freire, P. (1984). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. New York: The Seabury   Press.

Garrison, B. (2001). Diffusion of online information technologies in newspaper   newsrooms. Journalism. 2(2) 221-239.

Geisler, C. (1994). Academic literacy and the nature of expertise. Hillsdale,   NJ.

Gilbert, G. N., & Mulkay, M. (1984). Accounting for error. In G. N. Gilbert & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Opening Pandora’s box: A sociological analysis of scientists’ discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Guterman, J. (2003, April 25). Management by blog? Some see it coming, but it’s not here yet. Business 2.0 Barely Managing Newsletter. Email correspondence, May 16, 2003.

Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York, Routledge.

Heyboer, K. (2003, December). Bloggin’ in the Newsroom. American Journalism   Review. Freepress 10.

Kelly, S.P. (2003). The agonist: Thoughtful, global, timely. Weblog. Retrieved   May 20, 2003 from http://www.agonist.org/.

Klogs: Knowledge management weblogs. (2003). Yahoo! groups listserv. Retrieved May 19, 2004, from http://wwwgroups.yahoo.com/groups/klogs

Kucera, J. (2003). The other side: Joshua Kucera’s weblog. Retrieved May 20, 2003, from http://www.serendipit-e.com/otherside

Lasica, J.D. (2002, September 25) When bloggers commit journalism. USC Annenberg Online Journalism Review. Retrieved March 19, 2004, from http://ojr.org/ojr/lasica/1032910520.php.

Lewis, A. (2004, February 20). U. Maryland campus weblog use could explode. The Diamondback via U-Wire. Retrieved March 8, 2004 from LexisNexis.

McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy. New York: Basic Books.

Nolan, S. (2003, August). Journalism online: the search for narrative form   in a multilinear world. Proceedings from the Melbourne Digital Arts and Culture   Conference: Fine Art Forum E-zine . pp. 17(8). Retrieved March 19, 2004, from   http://www.fineartforum.org/Backissues/Vol_17/faf_v17_n08/reviews/nolan.html

Pax, S. (2003). Where is Raed? Salam Pax’s weblog. Retrieved May 20, 2003, from http://dear_raed.blogspot.com/.

Podesta, C. (2003a). OJO: Carolina Podesta’s weblog. Retrieved May 20, 2003, from http://www.serendipit-e.com/ojo.

Podesta, C. (2003b). OJO: ver desde Irak. Weblog de la Guerra. Distal. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Rich, A. (1984). Notes toward a politics of location. In Blood, bread, and   poetry (pp. 210-231). New York: W.W. Norton.

Rose, M., & Cooper, C. (2003, March 25). Web logs tell war stories, unfiltered and in real time. Wall Street Journal. The Archives. Retrieved March 28, 2003, from http://online.wsj.com/article_email/0,,SB104854599843896800,00.html

Rosencrance, L. (2004, January 26). Blogs bubble into business. Computerworld, 23.

Ryan, M. (2003, April 16). Sites are blogged down in controversy. The Chicago Tribune. Retrieved April 18, 2003, from http://www.chicagotribune.com/templates/misc/printstory.jsp?slug=chi%2D0304160255apr16&section=/printstory

Singer, J. B. (2003). Who are these guys? The online challenge to the notion   of journalistic professionalism. Journalism. 4(2) pp. 139-163.

Sites, K. (2003). Kevi

April 30, 2006 in Books, Journalism, Published Research, Television, Weblogs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

October 17, 2005

Fifth annual Pollner lecture draws big crowd

Link: Fifth Annual Pollner Lecture.

News & Events • October 2005

Fifth annual Pollner lecture draws big crowd

J-School Web Reporter

photo by Ryan Brennecke
Blogs have power because they are interactive and more personal, Boese said.

A visiting journalism professor who kept prominent war blogs from the Iraq war says she often feels trapped between two worlds: one of traditional media and one in the blogosphere.

Christine Boese’s Oct. 10 lecture, “Big Media and Little Bloggers: How corporate media responded to war-blogging journalists,” addressed tensions that arise when mainstream media and bloggers go after the same story but in different ways.

“What does little David have in his slingshot that is making Goliath sit up and take notice?” Boese asked

This year's T. Anthony Pollner Distinguished Professor, Boese delivered the annual Pollner lecture to a group of about 150 people in the University Center Theater.

Boese was writing for the “ticker” at CNN Headline News when the war in Iraq began. She said she had felt uncomfortable ever since the events of Sept. 11. “The thing that shook me up the worst was the uncertainty,” she said.

That uncertainty was magnified by her placement in two different journalism traditions: one in the mainstream media she was exposed to at CNN, and one in the blogosphere, where stories would break but often weren’t regarded as credible by the mainstream media.

“I didn’t know, or trust, whether or not the military would allow accurate reporting,” Boese said. “Most of the time I doubted what the so-called official sources were telling us.”

A long-time blogger herself, Boese wanted information when the war began from journalists who were in Iraq but not embedded with the military.

“I wanted to know I had sources on the ground in Iraq who were independent of the U.S. military,” she said. “I wanted to build their blogs so I could read their blogs.”

Boese met two journalists online and eventually became the keeper of their blogs. Carolina Podesta, an Argentinean journalist, wrote a blog that was featured on Argentinean television early in the war. At its most popular, her site was getting nearly 1,000 hits per day.

photo by Ryan Brennecke
Members of the Pollner family visited Boese's seminar on Oct. 10

Josh Kucera’s blog also grew popular. Eventually, after the Boston Globe wrote an article about Kucera’s blog, Time magazine, Kucera’s employer, demanded that he stop posting to his site.

For Boese, that demand raised important questions about the ownership of ideas. “Can employers lay claim to what Josh [and others] do when they’re off the clock?” she asked.

Stifling intellectual freedom in that way is a disservice to readers, she said, because blogs offer strengths that differ from the strengths of traditional media. A major strength of blogs is that they encourage readers to interact with what they read, rather than simply providing facts, which encourages readers to remain childlike, Boese said.

Mainstream journalists often cite credibility as a reason for following traditional journalism guidelines. But, Boese asked, “what if credibility is casting readers into the role of perpetual children?” News should be a conversation, not a lecture, she added.

Blogs are also noted for being more personal than traditional media and often seem more like letters home than a news story. “It is incidental, off-hand observations that I think give blogs their power,” she said.

But despite their strengths, blogs don’t signal the end of traditional media, she said.

“Blogs couldn’t survive without newspapers,” she said during a question-and-answer session following the lecture.

Boese is the School of Journalism’s fifth T. Anthony Pollner Distinguished Professor, a position made possible by family and friends of Anthony Pollner, a graduate of the School of Journalism who died in 2001. The Pollner professor spends the fall semester at the Journalism School, teaches a seminar and mentors the staff of the Montana Kaimin.

Previous Pollner professors were Jonathan Weber, a former reporter at the Los Angeles Times and editor of the Industry Standard, the fastest-growing magazine in American history; Tom Cheatham, a former UPI war correspondent and Emmy-award-winning producer and bureau chief for NBC News; Maurice Possley, a criminal justice investigative reporter for the Chicago Tribune; and Nancy Szokan, an editor at the Washington Post.

October 17, 2005 in Citations, Journalism, Portfolio, Television, Web/Tech, Weblogs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

October 13, 2005

Pollner Lecture to explore war blogs

Link: October 2005 news briefs: Pollner Lecture to explore war blogs.

Pollner Lecture to explore war blogs

photo by Sarah Galbraith
Christine Boese

Christine Boese, the T. Anthony Pollner Distinguished Professor in residence at the J –School this fall, will present a public lecture Oct. 10 at 7 p.m. in the University Center Theater.

Boese, a writer for CNN Headline News and a pioneer in the Web log movement, plans to speak about her dual role during the Iraqi war writing updates on the Headline News double-tiered ticker and privately keeping blogs for journalists in Kurdistan. The working title for the lecture is, “ ‘Big’ Media and ‘Little’  Bloggers: How Corporate Media Responded to Warblogging Journalists.”
“I started the war blogs because I wanted an independent source,” said Boese. “They were for kind of selfish reasons, because I wanted eyes on the ground to tell me what’s really going on.”

Boese acted as publicist, designer, host and liaison for Time magazine reporter Joshua Kucera’s Iraq War web log, “The Other Side,” and for Carolina Podesta’s blog “Ojo,” the only Spanish war blog reporting from Iraq.

“My idea of blogging is not an armchair quarterback,” said Boese. “My idea of blogging is a journalist who is there and active in what’s going on.”

Boese is spending the fall semester at the J-school, teaching a class on blogging and advising the Kaimin, the student newspaper.

“It was hard to unplug initially from the 24-hour news cycle, but now I’m functioning OK,” said Boese.  “I’m loving it here and meeting some wonderful folks and energetic students and faculty.” Boese’s lecture is open to the public at no charge.

- Keriann Lynch

October 13, 2005 in Citations, Weblogs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

July 31, 2005

Review quoted on the back cover of "Imagining the Internet"

Reviews for

Imagining the Internet: Personalities, Predictions, Perspectives

By Janna Quitney Anderson

Link: Rowman & Littlefield, Inc.: Reviews.

$27.95 Paper 0-7425-3937-7 August 2005 256pp
$75.00 Cloth 0-7425-3936-9 August 2005 256pp

"Janna Anderson offers a great perspective on the history and future of the Internet based on Elon University/Pew Internet & American Life Project's extensive prediction collection. Good books come from thorough research. Starting with the earliest communications systems, such as the telegraph, is a useful bonus. Being a part of and having the last word in this fine past-and-future Internet chronicle is a real honor." —Gordon Bell, DEC vice president of research and development, leader of the National Science Foundation's Information Superhighway Initiative, and senior researcher, Microsoft

"There are many books on the Internet and cyberculture—part hype, part gloss, sometimes solid technology criticism. Anderson's book is valuable because it helps sort out differing viewpoints and puts them in a historical context, recreating many of the ups and downs of the 1990s, before things got really crazy. She has an amazing database of predictions, collected over time, and selects from it well. This book is never dense reading, but it is packed with interesting facts and milestones to jar my memory, to help me recreate what that time was like, because the subtle changes are what have worked us over so thoroughly. My favorite part in these excursions into the words of technology prophets and critics is picking out the threads that had an influence—that helped shape the larger visions of what this massive commons has become." —Christine Boese, cyberculture columnist for CNN.com and writer for CNN Headline News

"[Imagining the Internet] looks at the future through an analysis of the past. It is somewhat difficult after becoming immersed in these insights to remember that Internet communication began with the utmost diffidence. Indeed the first events involved a computer crash and unmemorable twaddle. . . . We hope that this material will be useful to scholars who wish to assess the distance we have come; journalists who are trying to figure out where we are now; government, industry, and nonprofit officials who want to build the Internet of the future; and people of all walks of life who must learn to recognize the coming complexities of their networked world." —Lee Rainie, director of the Pew Internet & American Life Project, from the Foreword

"Janna Anderson illuminates with great clarity the history, dreams, and challenges of the Internet, which allow the reader to see glimpses of the future. A wonderful and important contribution." —Tiffany Shlain, founder and chairperson of the Webby Awards

July 31, 2005 in Books, Journalism, Web/Tech, Weblogs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

June 23, 2005

Request for a Serendipit-e, Inc. site to be added to the Library of Congress

I'm feeling all bright and shiny about an email I got today from someone at the Library of Congress, the MINERVA Web Preservation Project.

The project was asking for permission to collect, archive, and make available offline Joshua Kucera's terrific Iraq warblog, The Other Side, hosted on Serendipit-e.com, covering the period of the start of the war in March 2003.

The site got national media attention during that month leading up to the Battle of Baghdad for many different reasons, and sometime later I also wrote an academic paper about the site and the controversy it generated, which appears in the University of Minnesota "Into the Blogosphere" collection.

Along the way I decided to learn a bit about the MINERVA Project, and I'll dig in more as I have time, but I just felt like saying how pleased and proud I am to be associated with Josh's site and his work in 2003, and I'm even happier to know that it will be archived as part of the historical record of the Iraq war at the Library of Congress. What a very cool thing! I spoke with Josh to get his permission, and he's tickled too.

Here's just a bit from the email they sent:

The United States Library of Congress preserves the Nation's cultural artifacts and provides enduring access to them. The Library's traditional functions, acquiring, cataloging, preserving and serving collection materials of historical importance to the Congress and to the American people to foster education and scholarship, extend to digital materials, including Web sites. The Library has selected your site for inclusion in the historic collection of the War on Iraq Internet materials. The Library requests your permission to collect your Web site located at the following URL:


Our plan is to engage the Internet Archive, on behalf of the Library of Congress, to collect content from your Web site at regular intervals during the War. The Library will make this collection available to researchers onsite at Library facilities. The Library also wishes to make the collection available to offsite researchers by hosting the collection on the Library's public access Web site. The Library hopes that you share its vision of preserving Web materials about the War and permitting researchers from across the world to access them.

And here's some more information about MINERVA:

Link: About MINERVA (Library of Congress Archiving the Web).

Link: MINERVA Home: Mapping the Internet Electronic Resources Virtual Archive (Library of Congress).

The Library of Congress’ mission is to make its resources available and useful to the Congress and the American people and to sustain and preserve a universal collection of knowledge and creativity for future generations.

An ever-increasing amount of the world’s cultural and intellectual output is presently created in digital formats and does not exist in any physical form. Such materials are colloquially described as "born digital." This born digital realm includes open access materials on the World Wide Web.

The MINERVA Web Preservation Project was established to initiate a broad program to collect and preserve these primary source materials. A multi disciplinary team of Library staff representing cataloging, legal, public services, and technology services is studying methods to evaluate, select, collect, catalog, provide access to, and preserve these materials for future generations of researchers.

Maybe other sites get these requests all the time and I'm sort of a naive doofus, but I had a good chuckle on the serendipity that tonight I was watching Mr Smith Goes to Washington, which just happened to be at the top of my Netflix queue. I dunno. I been on a Frank Capra kick lately. LOL!


June 23, 2005 in Current Affairs, Journalism, Projects, Web/Tech, Weblogs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack